Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy A9 (2018), with a global score of 92.8 against 85.2. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a just a bit heavier device than Galaxy A9 (2018), but both are equally thin. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bit larger screen, a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot better video quality and a back camera with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has an 18% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.