Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, having a global score of 85.2 against 77. The Galaxy A9 (2018) is a just a bit heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but they have the same thickness. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a just a little better pixel quantity in each screen inch and a bit bigger screen. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing images or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a much better 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.