Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 general score. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s body is just a little bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it is just a little heavier and was released 6 years before. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a just a little better screen density, a bit larger display and a higher 1256 x 2760px resolution.
Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4310mAh battery size. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a way larger sensor and a lot better 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.