Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A9 (2018)'s general score of 85.2. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's construction is incredibly newer than the Galaxy A9 (2018)'s, although it's just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a brighter display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little better display pixel density, a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has an 18 percent more battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos, a lot larger sensor and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.