Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A9 (2018)'s general score of 85.2. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is notably newer than Galaxy A9 (2018)'s, but it's a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little greater display pixels density and a bit larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations, a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, faster video frame rates and a back camera with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.