Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a general score of 85.2, which is better than the Moto G Power (2021)'s score of 76.5. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is extremely older than Moto G Power (2021), it's design is thinner and somewhat lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much better screen than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels. Moto G Power (2021) features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a F1.7 aperture and the same video resolution, the Moto G Power (2021) also has a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 128 GB internal storage. Moto G Power (2021) has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.