Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s 76 score. Even though Galaxy A9 (2018) is much older than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's body is a little bit lighter and thinner. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has a quite smaller screen, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a just a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a lot tinier camera sensor taking lot worse quality videos and images and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a way higher resolution back camera.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features superior battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.