Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), getting an 86.2 score against 85.2. The Moto G200 5G is a way newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), although it is thicker and a bit heavier. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Moto G200 5G counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite larger display, a just a little better display pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460. The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a superior storage for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Moto G200 5G features better battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32 percent bigger battery capacity. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.