Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G51 5G's 77.8 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) design is thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Moto G51 5G, although it was released 3 years before. Galaxy A9 (2018) and Moto G51 5G feature very similar screens, because although the Moto G51 5G has a quite lower pixel amount in each display inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G51 5G takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G51 5G also counts with better video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 50 MP resolution.
The Moto G51 5G features superior battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.