Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than Moto G8 Power, having an 85.2 score against 76. Galaxy A9 (2018) is an older cellphone than the Moto G8 Power, but it is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter anyway. Moto G8 Power has a screen that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) one, although the Moto G8 Power also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2300px, a little more pixels per inch of screen and a little bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a little faster CPU than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a bit better camera than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a F1.7 aperture, a same size back camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a camera in the back with way more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 128 GB internal memory. The Moto G8 Power features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.