Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-11-15 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a general score of 85.2, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. The Galaxy A9 (2018) design is notably newer than the Moto Z Force's, although it's just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit better processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has more cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a little sharper display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Moto Z Force counts with a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) shoots clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a more megapixels camera in the back and a bigger aperture. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 3800mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.