Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Oxford blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has an overall score of 85.2, which is a little bit better than Motorola One 5G's 84.6 overall score. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is older than the Motorola One 5G, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter. Motorola One 5G features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution and a quite higher pixels count per inch of screen.
Motorola One 5G and Galaxy A9 (2018) count with similar CPUs, and although the Motorola One 5G has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola One 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola One 5G also has a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola One 5G counts with a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola One 5G also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One 5G counts with longer battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.