Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-11-15 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Action's overall score of 78.5. The Galaxy A9 (2018) construction is thinner than the Motorola One Action, although it is just a bit heavier and was released only 9 months before. Motorola One Action has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola One Action also has a just a little greater screen density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520.
Motorola One Action features just a bit more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola One Action also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a larger diafragm aperture and a way more MP camera. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a little better battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.