Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is a bit better than Motorola razr (2022)'s 81.1 global score. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is much older and a bit thicker than the Motorola razr (2022), it's body is still just a little bit lighter. The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little larger screen, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little higher pixel density.
The Motorola razr (2022) has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2022) also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much greater storage for applications and games than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 3800mAh battery size. Motorola razr (2022) captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.