Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | -- |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 392 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a general score of 85.2 against 79.2. The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a lot better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.