Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Ocean |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a general score of 85.2 against 83.1. Galaxy A9 (2018)'s construction is thinner and lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released around 18 months before. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution, a better pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a bit bigger screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a F1.7 aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor, better 60 fps video frame rate and a much more MP back-facing camera.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 12 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.