Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than the Samsung Galaxy A22, getting an 85.2 score against 76.1. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A9 (2018) is notably older than the Samsung Galaxy A22, it's body is just a little bit thinner and a little lighter. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2220 resolution and more pixels per display inch. Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a back camera with a much lower 24 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited environments and a lot better (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a little bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A22, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.