Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has an overall score of 85.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A25 5G's score of 79.9. Galaxy A9 (2018)'s design is a little bit lighter and a bit thinner than the Galaxy A25 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a little sharper display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bit bigger screen, a just a little higher pixel density and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a little bit better memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy A25 5G has improved battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32 percent greater battery capacity. The Galaxy A25 5G features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a larger sensor taking higher quality photos and videos and a camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.