Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-15 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than the Galaxy A70, getting a score of 85.2 against 76.9. Galaxy A9 (2018)'s body has the same thickness and weight than Galaxy A70. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A70. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A70 features a display that's just as good as the Galaxy A9 (2018) one, although the Galaxy A70 also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bigger display and a quite better pixel number per inch in the display. Galaxy A9 (2018) takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70. Both have the same video quality, a same size aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same sensor size.
Samsung Galaxy A70 and Galaxy A9 (2018) both feature quite similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, they have a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and equal internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.