Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy A9 (2018)'s 85.2 score. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's body is newer, but just a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy A9 (2018). The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a bit larger display, a quite better display density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.