Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than Galaxy A9 (2018)'s 85.2 global score. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer cellphone than Galaxy A9 (2018), although it is thicker and heavier. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has more pixels per inch of display, a little larger screen and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos, a way higher video quality and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.