Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-15 | -- |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has an overall score of 85.2, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S25's 82.6 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit greater count of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light images, it also counts with a way better video quality, a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a way larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy S25 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.