Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 392 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting an 85.2 score against 80.1. Although Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is older than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's construction is notably lighter and noticeably thinner. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater display pixels density.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has more internal storage.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has an 18% more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a smaller back-facing camera sensor offering a lower image quality, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.