Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 84.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2024-02-22 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.75 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Black, Blue, Titanium Gray and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.51") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is slightly better than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, having a overall score of 85.2 against 84.4. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, even though it was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a way better performance than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra counts with a much better display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a higher screen density, a bit larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra takes better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations, a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi 14 Ultra counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.