Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, having a general score of 85.2 against 78.3. Despite of the fact the Galaxy A9 (2018) is incredibly older and a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, it's body is still a little thinner. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bit larger screen, a quite better display pixel density and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A9 (2018) takes slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a back camera with lot less mega-pixels and a much tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting much worse quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photography and videos in low light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.