Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having an 83.3 score against 74.4. Even though the iPhone 11 is a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's just a bit lighter and also incredibly newer. The iPhone 11 counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
IPhone 11 features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a quite lower resolution of 828 x 1792px and a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features more storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 256 GB.
IPhone 11 features a superior hardware performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has less processing cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone 11 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The iPhone 11 captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a back facing camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a bigger camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a way better battery performance than iPhone 11, because it has a 61% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.