Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is much better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s overall score of 74.4. The Google Pixel 4 body is noticeably newer and much lighter than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s, but it's also a bit thicker. Google Pixel 4 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2280px resolution and a just a little higher pixels amount in each inch in the display. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB.
Google Pixel 4 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality and a larger aperture for better low-light images and video. The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.