Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-03-30 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit is just a bit better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting a global score of 77 against 74.4. The LG G7 Fit is a much lighter device than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but both of them are 0.31inches thick. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 Fit has the newer 8.1 Oreo version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo, so it provides a couple additional features.
The LG G7 Fit features a much better looking display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a lot better pixels number per inch of display, a little bigger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG G7 Fit's processor is very similar to Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s processing unit, and although the LG G7 Fit has 4 less cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have equal 32 GB internal storage, the LG G7 Fit also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G7 Fit captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a smaller back camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, they both have the same resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a much better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.