Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting a score of 81.2 against 74.4. LG V40 ThinQ is a way newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little faster processor than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a better display density, a quite bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG V40 ThinQ takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger camera aperture to take better photography in low light situations and a larger back camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a superior battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.