Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a score of 89.6 against 74.4. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Motorola edge has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola edge's design is notably newer and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s, but it is somewhat thicker.
Motorola edge has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little bigger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite greater screen density. Motorola edge counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 224 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola edge has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola edge also has 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a bit superior battery life than Motorola edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Motorola edge has a much better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and video, a lot bigger back camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a way higher 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.