Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s global score of 74.4. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the previous 14 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a way newer and lighter phone than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it's also just a little thicker.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit higher amount of pixels per inch in the display, a little bit larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a way larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos, a lot better resolution back facing camera and a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.