Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power is a little bit better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a 76.1 score against 74.4. The Moto G Power design is much newer and a bit lighter, but also somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G Power has the older 11 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit larger screen, a just a little higher pixel amount per inch in the screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2300 resolution. Moto G Power features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores.
The Moto G Power captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same camera sensor size and the same resolution camera in the back, the Moto G Power also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos. Motorola Moto G Power has a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB and more internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a battery life that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.