Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is just a bit better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting an 80.7 score against 74.4. The Motorola One Vision body is a lot newer and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s, but it is also just a little thicker. The Motorola One Vision features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit bigger screen, a quite better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a bit higher display pixels density. The Motorola One Vision captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a much bigger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos, a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.