Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a score of 82, which is better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 overall score. Although Galaxy A32 LTE Only is just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's lighter and much newer. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has the older 11 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). They have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a better display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little better count of pixels in each inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a way lower image and video quality, it also counts with a camera with way more megapixels and a larger aperture to take better low light captures and video.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) and Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only count with really similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.