Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is way better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a global score of 90.7 against 74.4. Although Samsung Galaxy A52 is just a little thicker than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's a little lighter and way newer. The Galaxy A52 has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a just a bit higher pixel count per screen inch, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A52 shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a larger camera aperture, a back camera with way more megapixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures. Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.