Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 global score. Galaxy A52s's body is notably newer and a little lighter than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s, but it's just a little thicker. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A52s has the older 11 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy A52s counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a bit bigger display and a little higher pixel number per inch in the display. Galaxy A52s has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has just a little better performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy A52s shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution, a larger aperture to take better captures in low-light situations and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.