Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a general score of 87.5 against 74.4. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy A71 is a notably newer device, and it is also a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
Galaxy A71 counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy A71 features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A71 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a way bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A71 has a lot better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a camera with a much higher resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a much bigger back camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy A71, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.