Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a overall score of 81.2 against 74.4. Galaxy Note 3's body is somewhat lighter than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it's just a little bit thicker and was released many years before. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has less cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a just a bit greater screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features just a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has an external SD slot that admits up to 64 GB against 256 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Galaxy Note 3 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, a smaller sensor capturing lower quality pictures and videos and a smaller aperture.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.