Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is much better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s global score of 74.4. The Galaxy S10 Lite is a incredibly newer and lighter phone than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it's also a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little better screen density, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger display. The Galaxy S10 Lite shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting images or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.