Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s general score of 74.4. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy S20 FE is a way newer and a bit lighter cellphone than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it's also just a bit thicker.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a quite larger screen and a quite greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S20 FE captures a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a camera in the back with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor and a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light situations.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.