Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Phantom black and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a score of 98.1, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s general score of 74.4. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is a a lot newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it's just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a lot better 1440 x 3200px resolution, a little larger screen and more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) and Galaxy S21 Ultra feature very similar batteries.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels, a much larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.