Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a 93.4 score against 74.4. Galaxy S22's body is extremely newer, just a little thinner and incredibly lighter than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 has older 13 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy S22 counts with a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little better pixels density, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bigger display. Galaxy S22 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S22 features a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S22 captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos, a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.