Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 7.7 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting a general score of 85.6 against 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 design is way newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a little bit bigger display and a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a way better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 52 percent more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.