Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2024-02-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue, Titanium Gray and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.51") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 14 Ultra has an overall score of 84.4, which is much better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 global score. Xiaomi 14 Ultra's construction is way newer than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s, although it is somewhat thicker and just a little heavier. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi 14 Ultra has older 14 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a way higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a quite larger display and a higher screen density.
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra's battery performance is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s battery duration.
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a way more MP back-facing camera, a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a larger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.