Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| -- | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T is better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting a general score of 82.2 against 74.4. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi 9T has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xiaomi Mi 9T is a notably newer and a little bit lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it's thicker.
Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a quite higher pixels amount per screen inch, a little bit larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Xiaomi Mi 9T has more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi 9T has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has greater battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 25% bigger battery size. Xiaomi Mi 9T takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a larger camera aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations and a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.