Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a score of 81.6, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s overall score of 74.4. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC construction is a lot newer, but just a bit heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a quite bigger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit greater pixels amount in each display inch.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a much higher resolution back camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has 32 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.