Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is just a bit better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a global score of 78.1 against 74.4. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's body has the same thickness than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it's lighter. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has the older 11 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite larger display and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a larger diafragm aperture and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features just a little bit longer battery life than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.