Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is better than the Google Pixel XL, having a 90.5 score against 81.3. Even though Galaxy A90 5G is somewhat heavier than Google Pixel XL, it's a bit thinner and also incredibly newer. Google Pixel XL features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better number of pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G has a bit better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with better battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 30% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A90 5G shoots better videos and photos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a back camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.