Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-04 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is a little bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 general score. Galaxy A90 5G is a heavier phone than LG V50 ThinQ, but both of them are equally thin. Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS, while LG V50 ThinQ counts with Android 10 OS.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a processor that is very similar to the processor in Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, they have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a better screen pixel density.
Galaxy A90 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a lot more megapixels back camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.