Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Blue |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's general score of 76.4. The Galaxy A90 5G is a notably newer and a lot thinner device than the Motorola Droid Turbo, although it is also somewhat heavier. The Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 operating system.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher pixel count in each inch in the screen. Galaxy A90 5G has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more processing cores and 3 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A90 5G features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 15% more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G takes better videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rates and a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.